Council has been rescheduled to Thursday, October 8, a day later than the October 7 date fixed earlier. According to an Office Memorandum issued by the GST Council Secretariat on October 5, the ...
In this case, the appellant filed a refund claim of ₹18,28,146/- under Section 54 of the CGST Act read with Rule 89(4) for ...
In this case, the appellant engaged in construction and sale of residential flats, had received advances of ₹1,28,80,050/- ...
The GST Council’s October 7 meeting will focus on process reforms and nothing on rate proposal is expected to be taken up, ...
The respondent, a manufacturer and exporter of mild steel billets, accumulated Compensation Cess ITC on inputs such as coal, ...
In this case, the petitioners engaged in manufacture and export of fly ash and fly ash bricks, claimed refund of ...
In this case, the petitioner had undertaken a highway project under an agreement dated 08.12.2010. The work was completed in October 2020. Subsequently, the petitioner received ₹36.47 crore towards ...
In this case, the four departmental appeals were filed under Section 112 of the CGST/UPGST Acts by the Assistant Commissioner, Special Investigation Branch, State Tax, Etawah, against orders passed by ...
In this case, the appellants challenged the First Appellate Authority’s order dated 31.10.2025, which had upheld penalties aggregating to ₹30,34,69,718 under Sections 122(1)(i) and 122(1)(vii) of the ...
GST Appeals in Limbo: Madras High Court Rules Time Spent on Rectification Petitions Must Be Excluded
The limitation period for filing appeals under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) has been a contentious issue, particularly when taxpayers pursue rectification ...
The Rajasthan High Court’s judgment in M/s Shree Karni Electrovision v. Union of India & Ors. (2026 Taxo.online 2587) reaffirms the mandatory nature of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results