Scholars discuss the future of agency independence following a recent ruling on for-cause removal protections.

Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court held, by a 6-3 vote, that the enormous tariff program imposed by President Donald J. Trump was ...

Just months before his administration moved to terminate Haiti’s TPS designation, President Trump slandered Haitian TPS ...

Were district court injunctions ordering agencies to spend time-limited appropriations an interference with presidential ...

A key Supreme Court decision limits presidential tariff power and reinforces why legal discipline matters for international ...

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Barbara may have been the most anticipated of the year. And the decision did ...

The decision was 6-3, but focusing on that split obscures the Court’s unanimous embrace of the premise that administrative ...

The Supreme Court’s case selection reveals a hesitancy to tackle major securities law issues. Circuit splits are not ideal, ...

The President’s order, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” sought to prospectively deny citizenship ...

In weakening checks on executive power, the Roberts Court overlooks the wisdom of its predecessors. The whole of the ...

Slaughter may force independent agencies to provide more rigorous justifications for new rules. The policy consequences of ...

Studies have linked preschool attendance and professional childcare for children ages four and below, also called early ...